Menu & Search
Speak to our friendly team
Contact Us Now

Pryers helped a client to claim compensation after a wrongly reported smear test caused her to need pelvic exenteration.

Jill’s story

In January 2005 Jill went to her GP complaining of vaginal discharge and bleeding.

She was referred to hospital for investigations. At the hospital a number of investigations were carried out in April 2005, including a cervical smear test. The cervical smear was reported as normal. In fact the test was abnormal. It showed evidence of a severe cell change.

In November 2006 Jill returned to her GP complaining of heavy periods and inter-menstrual bleeding. She was referred to the hospital and was seen later that month. Following investigations by a specialist Jill was diagnosed with cervical cancer.

Jill underwent radiotherapy and chemotherapy in January and February 2007 and brachytherapy in February 2007. Jill then also started to suffer anxiety and depressive illness for which she was treated with medication and counselling.

It appeared that Jill was responding well to treatment and was referred back to the care of her original hospital.

However, in January 2008 Jill returned to her GP complaining of back pain and was referred to hospital for investigations. These investigations revealed that her cancer had returned, and spread to her lungs.

Jill underwent surgery on the lung during August 2008 and surgery by way of pelvic exenteration in October 2008, following which she required a permanent colostomy and had to self-catheterise.

Jill became unable to work and required a high level of care and assistance from her family.

Pryers helped Jill claim compensation

Jill contacted Alex McKnight, a clinical negligence specialist at Pryers to investigate what had happened and help her with her future needs. Her case was funded by a ‘no win no fee‘ agreement.

Our investigations showed that the cervical smear test done by the hospital in April 2005 had been reported wrongly and that had this been reported correctly Jill would have been treated by way of hysterectomy, and, on the balance of probabilities, would have led to a complete cure. We obtained expert evidence from a Consultant in Clinical Oncology

The Defendant admitted in June 2009 that they had breached their duty of care owed to Jill but did not admit that this breach of duty had led to Jill’s subsequent pain and additional treatment.

The Defendant eventually admitted that its breach of duty had caused Jill’s ongoing problems and offered an interim payment of £30,000 and asked for information to consider the full value of the claim, which we provided.

On the basis of this information the Defendant offered £235,000 to settle the claim in October 2010, which Jill was happy to accept.

The Defendant also paid all of Jill’s legal costs so she had nothing to pay throughout the case or at the end.

Settlement £235,000
Start Your Claim Today1904556600
Tell us about your case

Just send us a little bit about yourself and your claim and we will respond within 24 hours.

    Get In Touch
    Latest News

    HSIB Recommend NHS reclassify Never Events

    A recent report published by the Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch (HSIB) says that NHS England should reclassify seven out of their 15 never events. […]

    Read More

    NHS Dentistry Hit by COVID Crisis

    The government is being urged to act by a health watchdog, who continue to hear negative experiences from patients, months after they published a […]

    Read More

    A Day in the Life of a Paralegal at Pryers

    Pryers is all about the people, we have an experienced team working together to deliver excellent service to our clients. We caught up with […]

    Read More

    Take a look back through our complete news archive

    Follow us on Twitter

    Thousands of urgent operations building up across London as Covid pressures continue

    Load More...