Menu & Search
           1904556600
Speak to our friendly team
Contact Us Now

Our client Chloe had a history of obesity, gastric bypass surgery, hypertension (high blood pressure), and type II diabetes. She was prescribed medication to treat chronic high blood pressure, a medication that inhibits angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) in the body which causes relaxation of blood vessels as well as a decrease in blood volume, leading to lower blood pressure and decreased oxygen demand from the heart.

Both high blood pressure and diabetes can contribute to the risk of kidney damage, and as such patients with diabetes being prescribed ACE inhibitors should undergo, at minimum, annual blood tests to analyse kidney function.

Despite this, Chloe’s GP did not perform any kidney function tests for a period of two years.

Chloe became very unwell. She was admitted to hospital with slurred speech and smelling of urine. She was diagnosed with an acute kidney injury and was treated with fluids. Over the next year, she attended her GP on several occasions and yet only one kidney function test was performed. Although the result was abnormal, no referral was made by the GP to a nephrologist (a doctor who specialises in kidney care and treatment).

During another visit to her GP, the doctor noted her medication had been stopped and negligently made the decision to start her back on the drug. Shortly later, Chloe was again admitted to hospital. Sadly, this time her kidney function had deteriorated considerably, and she was diagnosed with Stage 4 Kidney disease. She is presently undergoing dialysis treatment and is on the transplant list and hoping to receive a kidney from her daughter.

Pryers were aware that the time limit for Chloe to make her claim was fast approaching (known as Limitation), so had to act quickly. Initially, the Defendant claimed that Chloe has failed to comply with her doctor’s advice and attributed the entirety of her kidney deterioration to oxalate neuropathy (a consequence of gastric bypass surgery). The defendant was incredibly reluctant to provide evidence to support their theory and appeared to be delaying Chloe’s claim, requesting numerous extensions. Despite these delays Pryers was able to negotiate a settlement which recovered all of Chloe’s losses except the private dialysis treatment she had arranged as the NHS could have provided that for her. Chloe therefore agreed a settlement of £50,000.

 

Settlement £50,000
Start Your Claim Today1904556600
Tell us about your case

Just send us a little bit about yourself and your claim and we will respond within 24 hours.

    Get In Touch
    Latest News

    Victims can still sue Ian Paterson

    Ian Patterson jailed In 2017, breast Surgeon, Ian Paterson was jailed for wounding with intent. He had treated thousands of patients in his 14-year […]

    Read More

    Updates to the Civil Procedure Rules – April 2021

    Updates to the Civil Procedure Rules will come into effect on 6 April 2021. In this article, Jonathan Gray highlights some of the key […]

    Read More

    Vulnerable Parties and Witnesses – CPR Update April 2021

    On 6 April 2021 an update to the Civil Procedure Rules will help vulnerable parties and witnesses to navigate litigation. The new rules acknowledge […]

    Read More

    Take a look back through our complete news archive

    Follow us on Twitter

    We are looking for someone who is compassionate and understanding to join our New Enquiries Team.

    You will be the first point of contact for people wanting to make a medical negligence claim.

    Find out more about this exciting opportunity on our website.

    https://bit.ly/3ss1CUE

    Load More...