Menu & Search
           1904556600
Speak to our friendly team
Contact Us Now

Our client Chloe had a history of obesity, gastric bypass surgery, hypertension (high blood pressure), and type II diabetes. She was prescribed medication to treat chronic high blood pressure, a medication that inhibits angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) in the body which causes relaxation of blood vessels as well as a decrease in blood volume, leading to lower blood pressure and decreased oxygen demand from the heart.

Both high blood pressure and diabetes can contribute to the risk of kidney damage, and as such patients with diabetes being prescribed ACE inhibitors should undergo, at minimum, annual blood tests to analyse kidney function.

Despite this, Chloe’s GP did not perform any kidney function tests for a period of two years.

Chloe became very unwell. She was admitted to hospital with slurred speech and smelling of urine. She was diagnosed with an acute kidney injury and was treated with fluids. Over the next year, she attended her GP on several occasions and yet only one kidney function test was performed. Although the result was abnormal, no referral was made by the GP to a nephrologist (a doctor who specialises in kidney care and treatment).

During another visit to her GP, the doctor noted her medication had been stopped and negligently made the decision to start her back on the drug. Shortly later, Chloe was again admitted to hospital. Sadly, this time her kidney function had deteriorated considerably, and she was diagnosed with Stage 4 Kidney disease. She is presently undergoing dialysis treatment and is on the transplant list and hoping to receive a kidney from her daughter.

Pryers were aware that the time limit for Chloe to make her claim was fast approaching (known as Limitation), so had to act quickly. Initially, the Defendant claimed that Chloe has failed to comply with her doctor’s advice and attributed the entirety of her kidney deterioration to oxalate neuropathy (a consequence of gastric bypass surgery). The defendant was incredibly reluctant to provide evidence to support their theory and appeared to be delaying Chloe’s claim, requesting numerous extensions. Despite these delays Pryers was able to negotiate a settlement which recovered all of Chloe’s losses except the private dialysis treatment she had arranged as the NHS could have provided that for her. Chloe therefore agreed a settlement of £50,000.

 

Settlement £50,000
Start Your Claim Today1904556600
Tell us about your case

Just send us a little bit about yourself and your claim and we will respond within 24 hours.

Get In Touch
Latest News

Are you Ready for the Changes to the Civil Procedure Rules?

The Civil Procedure Rules are going to receive a number of updates on 1 October 2020. We look at some of the key changes […]

Read More

University Hospitals Plymouth Trust in Duty of Candour Prosecution

The University Hospitals Plymouth Trust appeared in court, yesterday, accused of failing to be open and honest. It is the first time a hospital […]

Read More

Mr Daniel Hay Accused of Harming Hundreds of Patients

The Times reports that Mr Daniel Hay, a Consultant in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, is the surgeon that has been accused of unnecessarily harming hundreds […]

Read More

Take a look back through our complete news archive

Follow us on Twitter

Cyclist broke his shoulder, following a hit and run incident with a London bus driver

https://bit.ly/3cBHJUy

We helped our client Jamie, who was knocked of his bike following a hit and run accident.

https://bit.ly/33Z5HFi

#SuccessStory #PersonalInjury

Load More...