Menu & Search
           1904556600
Speak to our friendly team
Contact Us Now

Former Court of Appeal Judge, and brainchild behind the biggest reforms the personal injury sector has seen in recent years, Sir Rupert Jackson, has recently tabled suggestions on further radical reforms, during a speech at the Medico-Legal Conference.

Jackson anticipates that his proposals would not only make accessing compensation quicker and easier, but also, less traumatising for the professionals on the other side.

Clinical Chamber of the Tribunals Service

The first of his proposals was the formation of a Clinical Chamber of the Tribunals Service, which would be responsible for both the civil claim and the disciplinary process. He believed that any decision reached would also carry more weight with the CPS, coming from a more authoritative source.

Jackson pointed out that the time and costs saved by this would also assist with the implementation of the fixed costs scheme, currently being consulted on by the MOJ.

Test for Medical Negligence

Perhaps the most radical of his proposals, was that the long-established test for medical negligence, which considers what standard a reasonable body of professionals with the same skill would have reached, should be replaced, by asking, simply: Has the patient suffered a ‘reasonably avoidable injury’?

He believes the benefits of this test to be twofold, by escaping the potential for compensation to be refused on the grounds that a provider was legitimately overworked and by shifting the focus from blame, to rectification.

Tariff-Based Compensation Scheme

Recognising that this would increase the volume of successful claims, he proposed that it be complemented by a tariff-based compensation scheme, whereby that ‘an equitable distribution of the available compensation amongst all deserving claimants’ is achieved, ‘in place of the present system in which a smaller proportion of deserving claimants recover higher damages’. Akin, on the face of it, to the Government’s current system for compensating victims of violent crime, the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme. It is important to recognise that this also represents a radical shift, from a system focused on putting victims, back where they would have been had the incident not occurred, to one where the amount of compensation is determined, not by the injured person’s specific needs, but by the availability of funds, as a whole.

Too Early for Further Radical Reforms

Pryers supports the aim of ensuring that deserving people get the compensation that they deserve more quickly. We also recognise that the vast majority of people working in the medical profession are there because of a desire to help people, so anything that can be done to reduce the trauma of the process on them, when mistakes do inevitably occur, should be encouraged. However, it seems premature to be proposing more radical reforms, whilst significant changes are still under consultation; it risks that process not getting the attention that it requires.

Although any changes will have an obvious impact on those working in the relevant sectors, it is the injured people at the centre of the claims, who have already suffered the misfortune of a medical mistake, who are likely to be the most affected. Although the current process might sometimes be long and costly, it is largely successful – and this should not be taken for granted. With the Government’s poor track record with compensation schemes in mind, it is hard to imagine how something as complex as medical negligence can be condensed into a tariff-based-scheme, without having a detrimental impact on the victim.

 

Start Your Claim Today1904556600
Tell us about your case

Just send us a little bit about yourself and your claim and we will respond within 24 hours.

    Get In Touch
    Latest News

    NHS Launch Maternity Leadership Training

    Nadine Dorries, the Patient Safety Minister has announced £500,000 to fund an innovative NHS maternity leadership training programme. Starting this year, hundreds of senior […]

    Read More

    The Government Response to the Cumberlege Review

    Nadine Dorries, the Minister for Patient Safety has recently issued an update on the Government’s response to the Cumberlege Review. What is the Cumberlege […]

    Read More

    Can Patient Safety Mistakes be Reduced with Help from the Aviation Industry?

    NHS staff are to be given training similar to what an air accident investigator might receive. The course starts on Monday and aims to […]

    Read More

    Take a look back through our complete news archive

    Follow us on Twitter

    A recent study of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) staff has shown that over half of them are more at risk of PTSD, severe anxiety or problem drinking.

    We simply cannot keep expecting superhero feats from our heroes without consequences. #HeroesNotSuperheroes

    https://nursingnotes.co.uk/news/research/icu-nurses-at-risk-of-ptsd-severe-anxiety-or-problem-drinking-due-to-covid-trauma-finds-study/

    The government has issued an update about their response so far to Baroness Cumberlege’s recommendations, following the report published last year into the treatment of patients with primodus, sodium valproate or surgical mesh.

    https://www.pryers.co.uk/the-government-response-to-the-cumberlege-review/

    Load More...