A photograph of a metal on metal hip replacement on a white background.

Pryers now act for over 200 hip patients

Hip Replacement Prosthesis Show in X-Ray

Pryers Solicitors of York now act for over 200 patients who have suffered the premature failure of their metal-on-metal hip replacements and resurfacings.  Claims for compensation are being brought against DePuy International Ltd, the UK distributor of the ASR and ASR XL hip products.

The team, headed by Richard Starkie, has been strengthened by the recruitment of two more solicitors, Lucy Macklin-Smith and Lindsay Perryman, who join Aftar Waris and Jamie Paddock.

The ASR hip was introduced in July 2003 and used extensively in a few areas of the UK, particularly York, North Tees, Surrey, Rotherham, Merseyside and Cardiff.  By 2007, a number of surgeons raised concerns that they were experiencing a higher than expected failure rate with the ASR.  DePuy’s response was that this was a problem with surgical technique, rather than a problem with the product.  However, as concerns grew, DePuy withdrew the product form the Australian market in December 2009 and from the rest of the world in August 2010.

Since then, hospitals have been recalling patients for tests, including blood tests; ultrasound and MRI scans; and aspirations of fluid from the hip.  Hundreds of people have been found to be suffering from excessive wear of the components, which can lead to damage to the soft tissues around the joint and even to the bone.  Revision surgery is then required, with a lengthy recovery period.  Patients frequently fail to make a full recovery and many require further surgery after revision.

Although, at the time of the product recall in August 2010, DePuy put the 5 year failure rate at 12-13%, some surgeons now estimate the 6 year failure rate as being as high as 49%.  If that is correct, it is likely that several thousand people in the UK alone will require further surgery.

Over the last 18 months, Pryers have worked with some of the world’s leading biomechanical engineers, biotribologists, metallurgists, metrologists, surgeons, toxicologists, epidemiologists, histopathologists and microbiologists.

We have been one of the leading law firms in the investigation of these claims and in the discussions with DePuy.

We have carried out extensive work the following: –

  • the precise nature of the design defect;
  • the testing procedures and how they failed;
  • the manufacturer’s delay in recalling the product;
  • establishing causation in individual cases and excluding other potential causes of joint failure;
  • determining prognosis after an ASR failure;
  • establishing causation of cobalt and chromium toxicity;
  • and the long-term health risks posed by exposure to these metals.

We have also been instrumental in establishing and co-ordinating a patient support group for the North of England, called Altogether ASR, which has had several meetings and will shortly be launching a website.  The group’s next meeting will be in March 2012.  Please contact Pryers for details.

A black and white photograph of an operating theatre. Mr Daniel Hay is accused of causing unnecessary harm in surgeries like this.

Number of identified Daniel Hay cases could be ‘tip of the iceberg’

Cosmetic dental procedure damaging oral health

New A&E Unit For The Elderly Only

Delays in cancer diagnoses: Covid fight not over yet