Menu & Search

Pryers solicitors currently represent the family of a woman who died at a hospital in Cumbria following a routine operation in 2016. The inquest into her death resumed this week.

44-year-old Sharon Grierson has left two adult children, and two younger children still at school.

The Senior Coroner for the area, David Roberts, was informed of the death amid concerns surrounding the removal and reinsertion of a breathing tube following a routine operation. After completion of the surgery, difficulties were experienced when bringing Sharon round from the anaesthetic, and the tube had to be reinserted. Despite the presence of four Consultant Anaesthetists, it took three attempts to reintubate her, and she went without oxygen for a total of at least 40 minutes. This caused her to suffer a significant brain injury, and she sadly passed away four days later.

Evidence from an independent expert anaesthetist instructed for the police investigation confirmed that the anaesthetists involved paid no attention to the zero readings on a capnography machine, which is used to ensure the patient is breathing properly. Despite the distinct lack of evidence that the woman was breathing, the anaesthetists continued to believe that the breathing tube was properly positioned in her airway.

During evidence heard this week, the Coroner asked the expert directly whether he was of the view that failure to consider the capnography readings would be considered to be a failure to provide basic care. A failure to provide basic medical care is part of the legal test required for a Coroner to come to a conclusion that a death was caused by neglect. The expert answered that he did believe this to be a failure to provide basic care.

Upon hearing this evidence, those representing the Hospital Trust and two of the anaesthetists separately asked that the hearing be adjourned. In the interests of fairness, and due to the evidence running into the evening, the Coroner reluctantly allowed the inquest to be adjourned.

The Coroner’s questions regarding a possible finding of neglect indicate how seriously he is taking this matter and the errors made by the hospital.

Understandably, the family are frustrated and upset by this adjournment. Nevertheless, they are pleased that Mr Roberts is treating the matter so seriously and hope that those involved will rightly be held accountable.

Start Your Claim Today1904556600
Tell us about your case

Just send us a little bit about yourself and your claim and we will respond within 24 hours.


Get In Touch
Latest News

NHS Workers Struggle Against Stress and Financial Pressure

Major concerns have been raised about the financial stress NHS staff face. A survey by the Royal College of Midwives (RCM) found that almost […]

Read More

Deaths of Two Nurses Highlight Work Condition Concerns

Campaigners have expressed major concerns about the working conditions of NHS staff after the deaths of two young nurses earlier this month. Kerrie Browne, […]

Read More

More than Half of A&E Departments Need Improvement

An NHS Watchdog has warned that more than half of A&E units are providing substandard care because they are understaffed and cannot cope with […]

Read More

Take a look back through our complete news archive

Follow us on Twitter

A doctor has recently been struck off for failing to diagnose sepsis and subsequently recording false observations in medical records.

https://dailym.ai/34N8XT6

A little #MondayMotivation to start your day with. You've got this 💪

Struggling today? Talk to us. We're here round the clock and waiting for your call 📱116 123 📧jo@samaritans.org

Load More...