Menu & Search

The government has recently suggested that the four-hour A&E target for waiting times might be abolished.

Despite some positive statistics with the policy, recent comments from the Health Secretary Matt Hancock suggest a change after an ongoing review into NHS clinical targets. This review has released an interim report suggesting that there will be four areas of focus for the new target: the time to initial clinical assessment, the time to emergency treatment for severe patients, the mean waiting time target calculated across all patients, and the utilisation of ‘Same Day Emergency Care’ to avoid overnight admissions.

Specifically, Mr Hancock, told BBC Radio 5 Live, assumingly after the NHS received its worst waiting times this winter since the target began in 2004, that ministers should be judged by “the right target” and a “clinically appropriate” one was needed. Currently, the proportion of patients attending major A&E departments in England that were seen within four hours has been at its lowest ever, having only managed to treat and then admit, transfer or discharge 68.6% of arrivals, far below the 95% that minsters say should be dealt with.

But, is it really that bad? Recent data involved with the distribution of A&E waiting times in 2011-12 and 2012-13, showed that during a period where hospitals were meeting targets for all patients in major NHS hospitals, that waiting times spiked before the four hours, with more than 10% of patients being admitted discharged or transferred to another hospital in the final 10 minutes before reaching the target. This, in contrast, creates a sharp decline after the four hours and is estimated that the target reduced waiting times by approximately 20 minutes.

Significantly the target has led to other benefits and impacts for the NHS, such as a 12% increase in the number of inpatient admissions as well as the extra visits increasing the average patient cost by £95, a 5% increase on an average cost of around £1,900.

Patients also have benefited from the policy by managing to reduce 30-day patient mortality by 14%, but with this in mind, it begs the question as to what is saving these lives – lower waiting times or extra admissions? A working paper from the IFS (Institute for Fiscal Studies) reveals that whilst there is no relationship between admissions and deaths, there are some that suggest that it is the bigger reductions in wait times that are associated with the larger mortality.

But what does this all mean for the proposed changes to the target? It’s fair to say that the four-hour target has played a pivotal role in improving A&E care since it was introduced. However, in light of recent performances over the past winter, no way does this mean that the NHS care can’t be better, the recent delays and compromises of service evidence this, but for every change they make or every scheme they draft, there needs to be a thorough thought process going into the design of any alternative targets introduced.

The benefits of the current target, in terms of mortality, are mainly a result of them being time-sensitive patients, many of which will also be included in the list of priority patients, therefore focusing the attention on these patients (including conditions such as sepsis, heart attack and stroke) could perhaps achieve even greater reductions in mortality than realised under the current policy. With that said, there is still little evidence for what the ‘right’ target time would look like to maximise the patient outcomes as well as one that would be acceptable for them. The one thing that will be guaranteed is that it will be highly disputed as we wait among further details to emerge.

If you know someone who’s treatment has been significantly compromised due to a delay in diagnosis, speak to our experts to find out how you can make a compensation claim.

Start Your Claim Today1904556600
Tell us about your case

Just send us a little bit about yourself and your claim and we will respond within 24 hours.

Get In Touch
Latest News

NHS Bereavement Scheme Extended

The Home Office has announced that the NHS bereavement scheme, which launched in April, has been extended. The NHS bereavement scheme offered the indefinite […]

Read More

Concerns Over Congestion and Drivers Texting or Emailing from a Mobile Phone

I Am Roadsmart, an independent charity focused on making better drivers and riders, has published their annual research findings into Driving Safety Culture. The […]

Read More

Hats at Home for Headway

Pryers Solicitors may be working remotely, but they are still making the most of social interactions. At the end of every week since lockdown, […]

Read More

Take a look back through our complete news archive

Follow us on Twitter

It's always nice to end the week on a high note, so here's a 5 star review from one of Sarah Moore's clients.

Sarah is a Litigation Executive in our Personal Injury team, and this review speaks volumes about what her clients think of her.

#FeedbackFriday

Research by @IAMRoadSmart reveals that when it comes to safety, the things that concern most people when using the roads are congestion and mobile phone usage.

Does this reflect how you feel? What's your biggest concern when using the roads?

https://www.pryers.co.uk/concerns-over-congestion-and-drivers-texting-or-emailing-from-a-mobile-phone/

Load More...